Pathetic Fallacy
n.
The ascribing of human traits or feelings to inanimate nature
for eloquent effect, especially feelings in sympathy with those expressed or
experienced by the writer, as a "cruel wind," a "pitiless
storm," or the lines from Shelley's Adonais:
Pale Ocean in unquiet slumber lay,
And the Wild Winds flew round, sobbing in their dismay...
The meaning of the term has changed significantly from the idea Ruskin had in mind. His original definition is “emotional falseness” when influenced by violent or heightened passion. For example, when a person is unhinged by grief, the clouds might seem darker than they are, or perhaps mournful or perhaps even uncaring.
Pale Ocean in unquiet slumber lay,
And the Wild Winds flew round, sobbing in their dismay...
The phrase Pathetic fallacy is a literary term for the attributing
of human emotion and conduct to all aspects within nature. It is a kind of personification that
is found in poetic writing when, for example, clouds seem sullen, when leaves
dance, when dogs laugh, or when rocks seem indifferent.
The British cultural
critic, John Ruskin, coined the term in his book, Modern Painters (1843–60), to attack the sentimentality that was common to the poetry of the
late 18th century, and which use continued among his contemporaries. That
fashion was waning just as John Ruskin addressed the matter; nonetheless, as a
critic, Ruskin proved influential, and is credited with having helped to refine
poetic expression.
The meaning of the term has changed significantly from the idea Ruskin had in mind. His original definition is “emotional falseness” when influenced by violent or heightened passion. For example, when a person is unhinged by grief, the clouds might seem darker than they are, or perhaps mournful or perhaps even uncaring.
photo credit: Stuck in Customs via photopin cc |
They rowed her in across the rolling foam—
The cruel, crawling foam…
Ruskin then points out that "the foam is not cruel, neither does it crawl. The state of mind which attributes to it these characters of a living creature is one in which the reason is unhinged by grief"—yet, Ruskin did not disapprove of this use of the pathetic fallacy: "Now, so long as we see that the feeling is true, we pardon, or are even pleased by, the confessed fallacy of sight, which it induces: we are pleased, for instance, with those lines ... above quoted, not because they fallaciously describe foam, but because they faithfully describe sorrow."
In some classical poetic forms such as the pastoral elegy, the pathetic fallacy is actually a required convention. In Milton’s “On The Morning of Christ’s Nativity,” all aspects of nature react affectively to the event of Christ’s birth.
The Stars with deep amaze
Stand fixt in steadfast gaze…
Ruskin considered the excessive use of the fallacy the mark of an inferior poet. Later poets, however—especially the Imagists of the early 20th century, as well as T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound—used the pathetic fallacy freely and effectively.
The Starry Night, Vincent van Gogh |
The device has also been employed in the visual arts, by many painters from van Gogh to Munch, and it has an undeniable effect on mood.
The Scream, Edvard Munch |
Our Challenge is to include pathetic fallacy in our poetry today. It is up to the individual as to how prominent a feature of the poem it will be. To avoid the pitfall of straightforward personification, remember to link the natural phenomenon to the feeling, tone or mood of the character, speaker or setting of your poem.
Sources: Britannica.com
Wikipedia
Hmmm...it so happens, I wrote something intending to post it on Monday,but due to dramas with my gas cooker(!) it never happened. Now by some quirk of fate, I realise I had included a Pathetic Fallacy of sorts in the middle of it...at least, I think I have...
ReplyDeleteHi friends, I've jumped in here to say that my week has been crazy and I have not had much time to read or respond to poems. Apologies!
ReplyDeleteI hope that you have fun with this prompt. Please remember that you are welcome to post tomorrow as well, and I will be around to read all links.
I sprained my wrist-I will be by but my typing is slow~
ReplyDeleteKerry, thank you for this prompt-it pairs well with some art I recently created~ :D
Gosh, this sounds like such a lovely idea for a blog hop.
ReplyDeleteI see you're an artist as well as a writer, Ella. That is wonderful.
(T.S. Eliot is one of my all-time favorite poets.)
Hope I managed to get this right... Otherwise it would, indeed be a pathetic fallacy on my part! *laughs at her own silly joke* Great prompt! Always a pleasure!
ReplyDeleteHi Kerry -- This should have been fun but I messed up, got mixed up, and worse. But I didn't have time for better today. Perhaps tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteThanks for all you do here.
..
Kerry, you distinguished so clearly between simple personification and the pathetic fallacy that I think I should go back in time and reteach my students! And I'm not sure I achieved it. It may read more like a miracle. But I picked a song to accompany my poem that absolutely has pathetic fallacy that works. Thank you for the challenge.
ReplyDeletemine's a bit oblique, or maybe just bleak... ~
ReplyDeleteGreat lead, very well done ... I'm sure Ruskin had plenty to complain about as the romantic era frilled into the lacy obsequities of the Victorian .. It's like our age, riddled with irony ... "Pathetic fallacy" perhaps protects us some from the self-indulgence of the Romantics, though there's also this older unity with nature which I pray we'll never escape. Best -- B.
ReplyDeleteI will return to read all of your poems! I am off to x-ray~
ReplyDeleteMore later!
thanks for the prompt Kerry...hope i
ReplyDeletegot it right..
Don't think I had ever consciously noticed this. Not sure I like it, but I'll try anything once.
ReplyDeleteMmm. Never heard of "pathetic fallacy" until your post but thanks to your explanation I recognise it and will understand it better in the future. No chance of me doping any poetry - sorry. I ain't that clever.
ReplyDeleteI do hope I got this right - otherwise red faced and apologetic.
ReplyDeleteI have something I hope applies--I was working on it after reading this, but not really sure at all if I nailed it--I will be around tomorrow to catch up with my toadly ones.
ReplyDeleteHey Kerry--this is what came to mind--I also am not sure it fits in with Ruskin's ideas--but a very interesting prompt--thanks. K.
ReplyDeleteKerry-- I should say that my whole poem would be alien to Ruskin! And probably to imagists--but it has to do with qualities that were ascribed to inanimate things--anyway! Thanks for thoughtful prompt. k.
ReplyDeleteI really adore this challenge and it made me get out my T.S. Eliot poetry book --- THANKS!
ReplyDelete… with that said, I hope I understood what it is… :P
ReplyDeleteLate to my own party, my poem is also linked to Music with Marian, because I have combined the prompts.
ReplyDelete